Just turn the graphs upside down, Angus. That will solve the emissions problem.

All this talk about emissions credits has confused the issue. Now imminent economist Ross Garnaut has warned that this misses the point. Nonetheless it’s a complicated argument and a spurious one.

Using Kyoto credits to meet Paris agreement ‘misses the point’: Garnaut

So if we are going to prove that Australia is going to meet its emissions targets, it’s actually much more simple to turn the emissions graphs upside down.

This is the real graph of what Australia’s omissions are doing on the right with the upside down graph next to it on the left.

Simple really.

The only problem is, that like the argument for using rollover credits, it bears no relation to the actual level of CO2 in the atmosphere and avoids the argument about tackling the problem of carbon emissions and climate change.

And the difficulty with this kind of discussion and argument is that it further removes any pressure on the climate deniers to address the serious issues that are currently consuming the bushland of Australia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.